The British made Magasthenes, from a collection of 30 different pieces, including text on stone, + broken paper.(fragments) And compiled book called ‘IndiKa’ written by him impose the world and especially India. Has this character really happened? Or gossiping?
What do the Hellenized Yavans of Indian descent, located around Anatolia, say about Megasthenes? Let us know it.
Strabo says Megasthenes is a brand of lies. Eratosthenes says Maggie lived in fantasy and lies. Diodorus says he leaves a lot of material in his writing. All writers criticize him because he is an expert in writing lies. Even the writings of all these Hellenistic writers from which the fragment is taken are also questionable.
The Encyclopdia Britannica was later revised.
It is as follows.
He gave the most complete account of India known to the Greek world and was the source for work by later historians Diodorus, Strabo, Pliny and Arian. The main drawbacks of Megasthenes’ work were errors in details, unexpected acceptance of Indian folklore, and tendency to idealize Indian culture by the standards of Greek philosophy.
This is a criminal case at first sight. Such gossip is considered historical by Indian writers and historians.
This is also a surprise. No wonder, we are in fall asleep, and we suckle the English history literature designed by the British and britisherised Orientalists, like a mother’s breast. ……….. We still haven’t opened our eyes that this is not Our mother, this is Pootna.(पूतना)
Even today no one knows where this Magasthenes was originally from, where he was born, who is the father and who is the mother.
Originally a collection of 30 fragments by dr. schwanbeck by the name of The Indica of Megasthenes. afterthen Scottish John Watson McCrindle came to India and becomes the principal of Devoton College. then becomes the principal of Patna College.
He writes a book, sorry and he made translates ” Ancient India ”(Megasthenes and Aryan) by Dr.schwanbeck
The book, written by Dr. Schwanbeck, had a hardly 60 pages. If we subtract the pages of some of the pictures from it, if we subtract the list of fake references, it is not more than 30 pages. Surprisingly, Maggie’s name is not mentioned in most of the fragments. Today this fragment will be in a dilapidated condition or dead. McCrindle wrote 160 pages from Dr. Schwanbeck’s 30 pages.
McCrindle did not come to India because of qualifications, he was brought, to write a fake & fictional history, the necessary material can be found from Calcutta and Bihar which can shape the British imagination.
According to the book, Megasthenes was the ambassador of Hellenistic Greece to India. According to this story, Alexander had a general named Seleucus nicator. After Alex’s death, S. Nicator was preparing to establish his rule over the conquered territory.
In which Sandrokott reaches Paramkamboj and liberates all the territories from the Hellenized Greeks, Seleucus was frightened so he married his daughter to Sandrokott.
Here also the question arises that when all the Hellenistic Greeks were defeated and fled, how could their general marry their daughter to Sandrokott ???? If the Hellenized Greeks had fled, would his family have stayed here ??? There is no such historical context.
The second most important question is whether the defeated Hellenistic Greeks would run for their lives or appoint an ambassador. Nowhere in history is it read that the loser has appointed his own ambassador ??????????
The town of Patliputra was not built in the manner described by Patliputra. One fragment states that the Indus is larger than the Nile. Sandrokotts was the king of Prasi, the capital of the Palibothurn παλίμπροθρν Hellenized pronunciation Palibro– palímprothrn). There is no word in Greek like Magli wrote palibothorn in Ionian Greek . At this time Pataliputra name could speak the Greeks clearly, and there were also characters like प ट ल त्र in greek, Therefore, there is no possibility of corruption of words.
Fraudulent English historians identify Sandrokottas with Chandragupta. There is no “ch” in the old or new Greek alphabet, so they used the χι font instead. It used for Christ.
Sigma Σ was used for ‘s’. So how did Chandragupta’s Sandrocottes, The special thing is that in Greek there is Gamal, (G ग ) and also ‘t’ त (theta). This is also the case with the Hellenistic Greeks, who used to use the word for ch in general, as well as the use of χι. not used sigma.
The letter ‘G’ or k ‘kha, Gh (group of K) is used for Ch. Where C is not available in the alphabet. कण्ठ वर्ण क वर्ण, च वर्ण (तालु). This is what Grimes-Law and Maheshwar Sutras say. The letter K is used instead of ‘ch’ in most European languages. The translation is also fictional, according to its own design.
Maggie had not traveled all over India, writes Dr. Schwanbeck. The way Maggie mentions Indian dress and food is also fictional work.
For the description of the river, it is said that the width of the river is 30 stadiums, that is, 606 feet per one stadium, 30 stadiums width = 12017 feet. around Five and a half kilometers wide. Magli refers to this as the river Ganga, let us know the width of the river Ganga. There are seven types of people living in India. In Palibothurn there were 517 forts. It had 64 gates. The total area of this polibothorn is 80 stadiums by 12 stadiums. in Km 14.5 km by 2.75 km, that was a Cool gossip !!! before christ, was there magi styled city in india ??????
Hey Kodumal Magli,
According to you, there were 517 forts in Palibothurn, so where did people live ??? built a nest in the sky ????
The town had many parks and lakes, Maglee added. Even if you build the smallest fort, it will cover an area of at least 400 feet by 400 feet. That is 160 thousand feet, such 517 forts = 8,27,20,000 l feet. 82720 km. 287 X 288 Km. I think meggi went to Chongqing city of modern day china. same total area, around the size of Austria.
Please bear with this gossip. We have been tolerating this gossip since 1900. Fake history has been imposed intead of teaching real history. Maggie the Universe Gappidas says, India was a square quadrilateral. In India, religious and scholarly people used to walk around naked.
Friends, an online dr schwanback’s IndiKa is also available, and a book by Scottish John Watson McCrindle is also available online. My guess is that the UPSC and GPSC exams have quations related to Indica.
But so far not a single Class 1 or Class 2 officer has studied this book with full details !!!!!!! Current historians are just like the English. Attempts are made to correct the error of the British translators by identifying Sandrocottas with Samudragupta. This is a vain exercise without self-respect. Where the whole book is full of gossip, it should be discarded instead of finding the truth.
|| अपूर्णम — संपूर्णम ||
जय आर्यावर्त जय भारत
Pt Dr. Hitesh A. Modha
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text.
An article in the scientific direction.
The History of Bharat is not the history of India.
The muslim and the British writers’ version is the one that is accepted as genuine and the truth.
Two major errors :
1) The nomenclature of the ” Gupta “s. 1st and 2nd is incorrect.
The correct name is ” Gut” or ” jut” as inscribed on their coins.”
2) Sandrokottus should be identified with the 2nd Gut/Juts, Chandrajut.
The G and J are interchangable