Surrounded by landless, limitless vast expansions of ocean on three sides and crowned by the sky dwarfing magnificence of the Himalayas in north, is Bharat – the land of Aryas. It is in this land where the first steps of a new born human civilisation was set, where the rain of culture nurtured the dark dead petals into odourants of heavenly flowers. This is the land, the longest continual civilisation of the world, where great men of high deed and gods have walked. But among this tsunami of fame and glory, esteem and honour, standing in the corner are few rare figures of history – wounded by the time, scarred by injustice – these are the figures who have been consistently demeaned and despised for deed they never did. One of these figures is the powerful Raja of 12th century India – Raja Jaichand – and the other is Rana Sanga – who is often blamed for inviting the barbarian Mughal invader Babur. But the truth, as often, is quite different, rather contrasting.

“Jaichand Gaddar Tha”, most have surely heard this line, from mouths of larger than life politicians, famed celebrities or even from mere social media personalities, this sentence is almost unanimously repeated with jolts & joy by every person, who falls perfectly fit into the great class of dim-witted brains. Same people have repeated ‘Jaichand was traitor’ line so often that it almost feels like a humming sound of irritated bird in cages like of dark ignorance.  And so it is the job of those standing with light to remove the darkness and open the cage.

Maharaj Jaichand – also spelled as Jaychandra – was the grandson of Govindchandra of Kannauj and son of Gāhadvala King Vijaychandra from queen Chandralekha. He was declared the crown prince of the Gāhadvala kingdom in 1168 and ten years later on the 6th Tithi of the bright half of the month of Asadha in the year 1226 Vikram Samvat – which corresponds to the Sunday 21st june 1178 AD – Jaichand became the king.

Raja Jaichand ruled over one of the richest territories in India, of the contemporary time, covering the vast expanse of lands making most of the present-day UP, to River Son in South-East, and nearly up to Patna and Gaya in the East. His rule was no less than any other king, of high prosperity and filled with pompousness. The same grandeur of his rule is documented profoundly in contemporary records. According to Tāj-ul-Mā’athir, one of such contemporary account, “Jayachandra prided himself on the number of his forces and elephants and had an army countless as the particles of sand.” The same is mentioned in Kāmil-ut-Tawārikh, which, throwing light on the military prowess of the Raja, says “The Hindu Prince had 700 elephants and his men were said to amount to a million, there were many nobles in his army.” Firistah’s account also refers to “a numerous army of horses, besides upward of 300 elephants which Jayachund Rye the prince of Kannauj and Banaras led.” One of the primary points these records so clearly illuminate was how considerable was the impression which the last king of the Gahadvala dynasty made on the invaders.

Roma Niyagi in her monumental work History of Gahadavalas tells us that there is no evidence of conflict between Raja Jaichadra and Samrat Prithviraj Chauhan (Storied were cooked up later)

Now apart from the usual grandeur of kingdoms and revealing words of travelers, Raja Jaichand had been the performer of rare noble feet, that no other king from the history can boast of – building of a great Vaishnav temple in Ayodhya, whose evidence was later found in the debris of ‘Treta Ka Thakur’. As it’s apparent from the discovery of an inscription in the debris of the Treta ka Thakur temple – the same temple which was converted into a mosque by Aurangzeb – in Ayodhya by Alois Anton Führer. “Inscription number XLIV is written in 20 incomplete lines on a white sandstone, broken off at either end and split into two parts in the middle. It is dated Samvat 1241 or AD 1184, in the time of Jaychandra of Kannauj, whose praises it records for erecting a Vaishnav temple, from whence this stone was originally bought and appropriated by Aurangzeb in building his masjid known as ‘Treta ka Thakur’. The original slab was discovered in the ruins of this masjid and is now in the Faizabad local museum”.

Undoubtedly the biggest blot on Raja Jaichand’s historic character is the myth of him siding with Ghurid Muslim invading forces of Mohammad Ghori against the great Rajput King Prithviraj Chauhan. But tearing in into the cadences & lilts of the long standing myth leave the point, crystallised, that there is not a single evidence contemporaneous to Prithviraj, which says Jaichand joined Ghurids forces against Pṛthvīrāja in the Battle of Tarain. On the contemporary, early Mohemmadan sources of that time (12th-13th century) mentions Jaichand bravely fighting Ghurids in Battle of Chandawar/Chandawal. Non-Marxist historians from Roma Niyogi to RC Majumdar all have pointed out that the same lack of evidence behind the myth. There was no reason or motive for Raja Jaichand to enter into conflict with Prithviraj – ignoring the historically inaccurate yet grossly misquoted account from the myth book of Prithviraj-Raso. Roma Niyogi in her The History of the Gāhadvala Dynasty notes that “There is no reliable evidence of conflict between these two kings”. Same is echoed by RC Majumdar says in An Advance History Of India that “There is no evidence, however, to believe that Jaichand invited Mohammad of Ghūr to invade India.”

Eminent Historian RC Majumdar is also of the same view that Patriot Jaichand had no role in inviting Mohd Ghori to India.

Moreover, Hammīra-Mahākāvya (composed around 1400 CE) doesn’t even mention the name Jaichand in the entire section dealing with Prithviraj and Mohammad Ghori. Even the Pṛthvīrāja Vijaya never talks of Jayachandra as an enemy of Pṛthvīrāja, leave alone arch enemy. In fact, both the kingdoms of Prithviraj and Jaichand, at no point (geographically) were sharing the borders. When the immediate neighbors i.e. Chalukyas are talked about frequently in Pṛthvīrāja Vijaya.

After the defeat of Prithviraj Chauhan in 1192 AD – first of his defeat after series of wins against army of Ghori including a win in previous year’s battle –  the barbarian invader turned his attention towards the Gahadvala dominion. And a battle was fought in the year 1194 AD, where Raja Jaichand died. Not likely what one would expect of an alliance. He died fighting a “Dharmyuddh”. He followed his Kshatriya Dharma very well. Great slaughter followed the victory of Chandawar. 300 elephants were captured alive, treasury was looted and nearly 1000 temples were destroyed and mosques were raised on their foundations. Hence, after knowing everything about Maharaj Jaichand, one could easily conclude that he was not a traitor .

Now to the second part of the mammoth myth is of “Rana Sanga inviting Babur to India”. As much as this myth is popular, it’s is also preposterous.

Bayana Fort where Mughal forces were severely routed by Rajputs under Rana Sanga

Some basic question which arises after hearing such bold – and unreliable as we’ll see later –  that how and why Rana Sanga was so assured that Babur would return to Kabul after defeating Ibrahim Lodi? – the king against whom Babur was supposedly invited. How he could be so confident that Babur would defeat Ibrahim and Ibrahim Lodi would not be able to defeat Babur?

Was Rana Sanga so weak that he needed the help of Babur? At basic readings, it makes it clear that this wasn’t the case. Rana Sanga was a fiercely brave warrior, one of the most powerful rulers of his times, who not only valiantly fought Muslim forces but also battered and defeated the Lodi Army.  So powerful was Rana’s assault on Muslims that Lodi era historian wrote ‘Sultan’s armies scattered, like dead leaves caught in a gale, in front of Rajput cavalry charge’. James Tod says that eight thousand horses, seven Rajas of the highest rank, nine Raos, and one hundred and four chieftains bearing the titles of Rawal and Rawat with 500 war elephants followed him into the field. The princes of Marwar and Amber gave him homage and the Raos of Gwalior, Ajmer, Sikri, Raisen, Kalpi, Chanderi, Bundi, Gagraun, Rampura, and Abu served him as tributaries or held him as chief.

The Rajput Cavalary charge at Bayana was so fierce that Not a Single Mughal soldier was ready to take up arms against the Rajputs in Khanwa, until Babur made all of them swear on Kuran

Explaining about the administration and wars of Rana Sanga, James Tod further says that – He had gained eighteen pitched battles against the Kings of Delhi and Malwa, in two of these he was opposed by Ibrahim Lodi in person at Bakrol and Ghatoli, in latter of the battle the imperial forces were badly defeated with great slaughter, leaving a prisoner of the blood royal to grace the triumph of Chittor. Such brave a king and man like Rana Sanga would be of the least possibility whatsoever to need an alliance with Babur. So the question arises is from where does this idea of Rana Sanga inviting Babur is coming from? It is from a source that is prone to heavy untruthfulness and dishonesty, a chronicle of a dishonest barbarian, the Baburnama.

Baburnama is the only source where Babur has written this. And there are more than enough reasons for one to not believe in Baburnama because –

1) Babur has lied many times in Baburnama, he said that he had only 12000 soldiers in Panipat, but according to history professors and researchers, that number must have been much higher.

2) No other Hindu/Muslim contemporary account mentions of the event.

3) Rana Sanga didn’t need any alliance, (as has already been cleared above).

4) Babur has given details of other alliances but not of this one .

5) Hindu record in this matter, the daily bulletin of Rana’s life, written everyday by family priest of Rana is a reliable source and it says that “It was not Sanga who sent an envoy to Kabul to propose an alliance with Babur against their common foe, Ibrahim of Delhi, but the king of Kabul (Babur), who was anxious to have an ally of undoubted ability and strength during the course of his proposed expedition in an unknown country.”

Now let’s see how and why Babur entered India – He writes in his autobiography – “as it was always in my heart to possess Hindustan and as these several countries had once been held by the Turks, I pictured them as my own and was resolved to get them into my hands whether peacefully or by force”.

The Sultan of Delhi, Ibrahim Lodi, was weak and unpopular, he had alienated his nobles and chiefs. Punjab, a normal fief of Delhi was held by governor Daulat Khan, who was practically independent. So were the governors of Sindh, Multan, Jaunpur and Bengal. The Rajput states had formed themselves into a confederacy under Rana Sanga. At that time India was divided into numerous independent states without any strong central authority to hold them together . Babur was well aware of this state of affairs in India. In 1523, Babur set out for Punjab to find that Ibrahim’s army had already defeated Daulat Khan who had invited him to invade India in the hope of personal gain. Babur in turn defeated the sultan’s army. Then, instead of making Daulat Khan the governor of Punjab, he appointed his own heir to the government of Punjab and gave Daulat Khan a small fief. Then he returned to Kabul in 1524. Next year he came with a bigger army to find Daulat Khan and Alim Khan, who had made an independent bid for power, and defeated them. Babur pardoned Daulat Khan and many Afghan amirs along with their troops joined Babur. Uncle of Ibrahim Lodi, Alam Khan, asked for the help of Babur to dethrone Ibrahim Lodi.

Eminent Historian Jadunath sarkar clearly mentions in his work the reasons why Daulat Khan Lodhi invited Babur to India

Battle of Panipat took place on 21 April 1526 in which Ibrahim Lodi was defeated and killed. Babur had intentions to stay in India when Afghan chiefs realised it, they proclaimed Sultan Mohammad of Bihar as their king, while some wanted to place the brother of Ibrahim Lodi as their King. But Babur managed to sort out everything, sent a force under Humayun who drove away from the rebel Afgan chiefs across the Ganges. But apart from the danger of Afghans, there was the greater danger, “The Rajputs “. 

A great coalition of Rajput chiefs had been formed under Raja Sangram Singh (Rana Sanga) , of Mewar. He had lost one eye, one arm, and a leg, and his body bore more than 80 wounds received in battle. Hasan Mewati and Muhammad Lodi, these Afghan chiefs also joined this alliance against Babur .

Babur declared that the war against the Rajputs was a jihad, an Islamic holy war. Advance force sent by Babur was destroyed by Rana Sanga’s army. Babur renounced wine drinking and inspired his soldiers to take vow on Quran, fortified his camps with gun carriages, made preparations and then the battle took place at Khanua, on 16th March 1527, Rana Sanga was wounded, got unconscious, and was taken away from battlefield by his followers. Rajputs had to suffer defeat due to lack of resources, and lack of advanced equipments. However the defeat didn’t affect Rana Sanga and he took a vow to never enter fort of Chittor without achieving victory over Babur.

However Rana Sanga died in January 1528 and couldn’t fulfil his mission, but he never submitted to Babur. He fought with all his strength, and lived a life full of self respect. Rana Sanga was undoubtedly one of the best warriors of his time. Lack of resources and lack of advanced equipment and weapons led to his defeat. Rana Sanga holds a special place in history of Rajputs.

Hence it’s clear that Rana Sanga never invited Babur to attack India. It was Daulat Khan who invited Babur.

The Eminent Historian Gopinath Sharma in his monumental work Mewar Ka Itihas lists down the reasons of Lies Spread by Babur in his memoir Baburnama

It’s really shameful that instead of respecting these two great warriors, people call them”traitors” without knowing the actual truth.

Maharaj Jaychandra erected the Vaishnav temple at Ayodhya, was a great king of his time, and died fighting “Dharmyuddha” with Malecchas. Rana Sanga/Raja Sangram Singh was a great warrior of his time, never bowed his head down to Muslim invaders, fought with them with all his strength, and yet people blame him that he invited Babur to invade India. These are misconceptions arising due to dishonest historiography by Marxist historians whose sole objective while writing was to somehow shift blame towards Hindus alone and glorify invaders. And till today the many number of people under Marxist spell parrot the same lie. These are two mammoth myths created by Marxists and propagated by dishonest history readers that have battered the subject of history like none else.

Sources:

  1. History of Gahadawalas by Roma Niyogi
  2. Advanced History of India by RC Majumdar
  3. Mewar and Mughal Emperors by GN Sharma
  4. Military History of India by Jadunath Sarka
  5. Kshatriya Itihas on Twitter : https://twitter.com/KshatriyaItihas/status/1335956374426013696
  6. Yogi Singh on Twitter: https://twitter.com/thakuragain?s=09
  7. Lost history on twitter : https://twitter.com/Lost_History1?s=09
  8. Rajputcommunity.in Article : https://www.rajputcommunity.iuun/t/rajputs-defeat-specialists-1-3-fact-check-on-a-mainstream-fraud/499

DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text.