In recent controversy of the Sikh Girl marriage /unmarriage, unmarriage case in Kashmir, the hornet’s nest of #LoveJihad became the focus of all debates , yet again .
With all the Jammat e Fiberal denying that such a conspiracy exists and that it is a made up construct to target Muslims and Islamophobia.
I am sure anyone with even 1 functioning grey cell would be aware of the multiple case when Muslim men have lied to a Hindu girl about being a Hindu , trapped her in love , married her . In all such cases , the woman converts to Islam , most of the times before marriage . Most of them land up dead , beaheaded in a suitcase , tortured .
Now let us analyze the issue .It is ALWAYS and ALWAYS a Muslim man lying to be a Hindu to trap a Hindu woman . ALWAYS . WHY ? Why lie about your name and religion ? When was the last time a Hindu man pretended to be a Christian to trap a Christian woman to get married to her and convert her to Hinduism. When was the last time a Parsee man lied to be a Jain to trap a Jain girl , get her converted to Jainism and get married ? OR ANY OTHER PERMUTATION and COMBINATION .
Only one combination and process has been seen . Muslim man lying to be a hindu to trap a Hindu girl , force her to convert to Islam and then rape/kill her . ALWAYS .
If such a repeated incident occurs ALL the time , then it is a pattern of crime and planned conspiracy. No seriously why lie about your name religion? And always same religion and gender . ALWAYS . Love is not a crime, but putting up a fake facade , lying to trap a woman is a crime. Then your intentions are not love and marriage, your intentions are of fraud , a crime.
It is love when a Pooja falls in love with a Rahim, It is love when an Amit falls in love with Rehana, but it is a planned crime when a Rahim lies about being an Amit and traps Pooja and forced her convert . PERIOD.
So many marches about #loveJihad , why no marches or discussion on these lies about muslim men lying to be a Hindu to trap Hindu women and force them to convert and eventually kill her (in many cases ).
Yes I know many happy interfaith couples . Mostly Muslim men and Hindu women . Happily married , no conversion. Almost all belong to Upper class, educated families , where even people in Muslim families drinks , smoke , indulge in premarital sex including women) . Very technically such COSMOPOLITAN Muslim families would not even be considered Muslims by majority and such marriages would be considered not valid. I know so many Bihari families who have not taken a penny of dowry , does that mean dowry does not exist and we should not have laws against dowry . Are multiple dowry deaths a farce ? India must be only country in the world where a law against dowry exists. Why, because we have dowry-related crime. Simple .
Every time a new type of crime comes in , new laws need to be created . If such a repeated crime is coming to notice then new laws need to be made. And if anyone lies about their religion and name to trap a woman, then it is not love, it is a planned conspiracy and crime and laws need to be made to tackle them.
Who are these liars who are denying that such cases don’t exist . Really . It started with 1 corona case and it spread world wide. Had we spotted corona with a few cases and took caution and precaution to stop it from spreading the world would not be in such a big mess. Had we banned flights from China , had we started testing people early .
We did not have IT laws , but when crimes related to IT started , laws were made.
So if crimes related to fake name, religion , trap , conversion , death is happening , we need laws .
Tell me one case where a where a Christian pretended to be a Hindu to trap a Hindu girl ? I have never heard of it . EVER . It is ALWAYS a Muslim man , lying to a be a hindu to trap a Hindu girl (in India).
This trapping women from different faith (read mostly Sikhs) has been happening in UK since long .
Same religion/gender .
So if it happens repeatedly , in the same manner , then it is a planned crime and it needs to be tackled. SIMPLE . We need laws. Period.
DISCLAIMER: The author is solely responsible for the views expressed in this article. The author carries the responsibility for citing and/or licensing of images utilized within the text.